DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20195159

Clinical evaluation of the proximal femur intramedullary nail antirotation system-II for treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fractures

Ram Avtar, Rajat Gupta

Abstract


Background: Pertrochanteric fractures are relatively common among the elderly. Common techniques for fixation of these fractures are sliding hip screw and plate or intramedullary nailing. The objective of the present study was designed to evaluate and analyze the role of proximal femoral nail antirotation II (PFNA II) in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fractures.

Methods: It was a prospective study on 50 cases of unstable pertrochanteric fractures. Harris hip score was used for functional assessment.

Results: In this study at 6 months follow up, Union was achieved in 48 cases, technical and mechanical complications were noted in 6% cases (3 cases). Reoperation rate was 4% (2 cases). According to Harris Hip scoring system Excellent results were noted in 26 cases, good in 14 cases, fair in 8 cases and poor result in 2 cases.

Conclusions: It is concluded from our study that PFNA II is an attractive and suitable implant for unstable pertrochanteric fractures.


Keywords


Proximal femoral nail antirotation II, Intertrochanteric fractures, Pertrochanteric fractures, Proximal femur fracture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Xu YZ, Geng DC, Mao HQ, Zhu XS, Yang HL. A comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation device and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fracture. J Int Med Res. 2010;38:1266–75.

Li MH, Wu L, Liu Y, Wang CM. Clinical evaluation of the Asian proximal femur intramedullary nail antirotation system (PFNA-II) for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Sur Res. 2014;9:112.

Prins S, Letsch R, BuÈ scher D. Gamma-nagel und Classic-nagel (intramedullaÈ re Stabilisierung) versus DHS (extramedullaÈ re Stabilisierung) bei proximalen Femurfracturen. Hefte Unfallchir. 1996;262:14

Mereddy P, Kamath S, Ramakrishnan M, Malik H, Donnachie N. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): A new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 2009;40:428–32.

Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(1):1-154.

Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end‐result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–55.

Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77:1058-64.

Sierra RJ, Cabanela ME. Conversion of failed hip hemi- arthroplasties after femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;399:129-39.

Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): A new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999;30:327–32.

Simpson AH, Varty K, Dodd CA. Sliding hip screws: modes of failure. Injury. 1989;20:227–31.

Moein CM, Verhofstad MH, Bleys RL, van der Werken C. Soft tissue injury related to choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: piriform fossa or greater trochanter tip. Injury. 2005;36:1337–4.

AO/ASIF. PFNA Leading the Way to Optimal Stability: Synthes. Original Instruments and Implants of the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation. Oberdorf, Switzerland: STRATEC Medical; 2004: 1–44.

Mereddy P, Kamath S, Ramakrishnan M, Malik H, Donnachie N. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): A new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 2009;40:428–32.

Klinger HM, Baums HM, Eckert M, Neugebauer R. A comparative study of unstable per and intertrochanteric femoral fractures with DHS and PFN and TSP. Zentralbl Chir. 2005;2005:130.

Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JW, Al-Lami M. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury. 2002;33(5):395-9.

Aguado-Maestro I, Escudero-Marcos R, Garcia-Garcia JM, Alonso-Garcia N, Perez-Bermejo DD, Aguado-Hernandez HJ, et al. Results and complications of pertrochanteric hip fractures using an intramedullary nail with a helical blade (proximal femoral nail antirotation) in 200 patients. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2013;57:201–7.

Takigami I, Matsumoto K, Ohara A, Yamanaka K, Naqanawa T, Ohashi M, Date K, Shimizu K. Treatment of trochanteric fractures with the PFNA (proximal femoral nail antirotation) Nail system–report of early results. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66:276–9.

Zhang H, Zhu X, Pei G, Zeng X, Zhang N, Xu P, et al. A retrospective analysis of the InerTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotationin in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis: A minimum follow-up of 3 years. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12:147.

Karapınar L, Kumbaracı M, Kaya A, Imerci A, Incesu M. Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) to treat peritrochanterics in elderly patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2011;5:1–7.

Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, Hochertz T, Vochteloo AJ, Werken C, On Behalf of the AO—PFNA Studygroup The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: Results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury. 2008;39:932–9.

Macheras GA, Galanakos SP, Koutsostathis S, Kateros K, Karras A, Papadakis SA. Unstable pertrochanteric Fractures. A comparison of preliminary results using three different methods of fixation. EEXOT. 2013;64:25–33.