DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20201731

Prospective comparative study of extra-articular distal tibia fractures-intramedullary nailing versus medial minimally invasive percutaneous plating

Devendra Lakhotia, Ashok Meena, Madharam Bishnoi, Kartikeya Sharma, Padmakar Shinde

Abstract


Background: The distal tibia extra-articular fractures are treated with both intramedullary nailing (IMN) and medial minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO). The aim of this study was to compare the results of IMN and medial MIPPO in distal tibia fractures. The complications and secondary interventions in both groups were compared.

Methods: Fifty patients with distal tibia were randomly assigned to IMN (group 1) and medial MIPPO group           (group 2). The functional outcomes were evaluated using American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Complications like infection, delayed union, non-union, malunion, hardware prominence and secondary interventions were compared.

Results: The average union time was 21.12±6.93 weeks in group 1 and 23.56±6.96 weeks in group 2 (p=0.220). The mean AOFAS scoring was 90.76±7.9 in group 1 and 88.4±8.33 in group 2 (p=0.339). Five patients in group 1 and one in group 2 had malalignment. Deep infection was present in one and superficial infection was present in two cases in group 2. None of the patients in group 1 had infections. Three patients in group I developed anterior knee pain and six in group 2 had hardware prominence. Seven cases in IMN group required secondary interventions and fourteen in medial MIPPO group.

Conclusions: Extra-articular distal tibia fractures are successfully treated with IMN and medial MIPPO with comparable functional outcomes. Prevalence of malunion was higher in IMN group and hardware prominence was more prevalent in MIPPO group. Implant removal are more in medial MIPPO group mostly due to implant irritation.

 


Keywords


MIPPO, IMN, Distal tibia, Extra-articular

Full Text:

PDF

References


Tang X, Liu L, Tu CQ, Li J, Li Q, Pei FX. Comparison of early and delayed open reduction and internal fixation for treating closed tibial pilon fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:657-64.

Drosos G, Karnezis IA, Bishay M, Miles AW. Initial rotational stability of distal tibial fractures nailed without proximal locking: the importance of fracture type and degree of cortical contact. Injury. 2001;32:137-43.

Obremskey WT, Medina M. Comparison of intramedullary nailing of distal third tibial shaft fractures:before and after traumatologists. Orthopedics. 2004;27:1180-4.

Janssen KW, Biert J, van Kampen A. Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail. A retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. Int Orthop. 2007;31(5):709-14.

Attal R, Hansen M, Kirjavainen M, Bail H, Hammer TO, Rosenberger R et al. A multicentre case series of tibia fractures treated with the expert tibia nail (ETN). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(7):975-84.

Moongilpatti Sengodan M, Vaidyanathan S, Karunanandaganapathy S, Subbiah Subramanian S, Rajamani SG. Distal tibial metaphyseal fractures:does blocking screw extend the indication of intramedullary nailing? ISRN Orthop. 2014;2014:542-623.

Jain D, Selhi HS, Yamin M, Mahindra P. Soft tissue complications in distal tibial fractures managed with medial locking plates:a myth or reality? J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017;8(2):90-5.

Im GI, Tae SK. Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia:a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation. J Trauma. 2005;59(5):1219-23.

Toms AD, McMurtie A, Maffuli N. Percutaneous plating of the distal tibia. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:199-203.

Barie DP. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 7th edition. Pilon fractures. In: Bucholz RW, Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, Tornetta P, eds. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2010. 2010: 1928-1974.

Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating system for the ankle, hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349-53.

Nork SE, Schwartz AK, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, Winquist RA. Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1213-21.

Li YC, Jiang X, Guo Q, Zhu L, Ye T, Chen A. Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by three different surgical methods: a randomized, prospective study. Int Orthop. 2014;38(6):1261-7.

Mushtaq A, Shahid R, Asif M, Maqsood M. Distal tibial fracture fixation with locking compression plate (LCP) using the minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009;35:159-64.

Kumar D, Ram GG, Vijayaraghavan PV. Minimally invasive plate versus intramedullary interlocking nailing in distal third tibia fractures. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2014;13:15-7.

Shen J, Xu J, Tang M, Luo C, Zhang C. Extra-articular distal tibia facture (AO-43A):A retrospective study comparing modified MIPPO with IMN, Injury. Int J Care Injured. 2016;47:2352-9.

Barcak E, Collinge CA. Metaphyseal Distal Tibia Fractures: A Cohort, Single-Surgeon Study Comparing Outcomes of Patients Treated With Minimally Invasive Plating Versus Intramedullary Nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(5):169-74.

Pawar ED, Agrawal SR, Patil AW, Choudhary S, Asadi G. A comparative study of intramedullary interlocking nail and locking plate fixation in the management of extra articular distal tibial fractures. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2014;3:6812-26.

Guo JJ, Tang N, Yang HL, Tang TS. A prospective, randomised trial comparing closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous plating in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:984-8.

Yao Q, Ni J, Peng LB, Yu DX, Yuan XM. Locked plating with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nailing of distal extra-articular tibial fracture:A retrospective study. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013;93(47):3748-51.

Vallier HA, Le TT, Bedi A. Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures (4 to 11 cm proximal to the plafond):plating versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:307-11.

Lau TW, Leung F, Chan CF, Chow SP. Wound complication of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibia fractures. Int Orthop. 2008;32(5):697-703.

Katsoulis E, Court-Brown C, Giannoudis PV. Incidence and aetiology of anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(5):576-80.

Krackhardt T, Dilger J, Flesch I, Hontzsch D, Eingartner C, Weise K. Fractures of the distal tibia treated with closed reduction and minimally invasive plating. Arch Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2005;125(2):87-94.

Wani IH, Ul Gani N, Yaseen M, Bashir A, Bhat MS, Farooq M. Operative Management of Distal Tibial Extra-articular Fractures - Intramedullary Nail Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2017;19(6):537-41.