DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20203055

A prospective comparative study between interlocking nail and locking compression plate for management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus

Mallesh Rathod, Sandeep Kumar Kanugula, Pannuri Raja

Abstract


Background: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between open reduction and internal fixation by locking compression plate (LCP) and closed reduction and internal fixation with anterograde interlocking nail (ILN) for the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus.

Methods: This is a prospective comparative study, with diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated by LCP in 30 patients and with ILN in 30 patients. Patients were followed up to 18 months. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed in terms of union, complications, reoperation rate and functional outcome using the American shoulder and elbow surgeons’ score (ASES) and Stewart and Hundley’s criteria.

Results: Union was achieved in 93.3% of patients in LCP group and 90% in ILN group. The mean blood loss in LCP group was 280±22.10 ml (160-400 ml) and in ILN group was 110±17.62 ml (70-150 ml) (p=0.001). The ASES score was 42.47±5.532 in LCP group and 40.93±6.330 in nailing group (p=0.320; p>0.05). Stewart Hundley criteria showed excellent and good results in 26/30 and 17/30 patients in LCP group and ILN group respectively (p=0.070; p>0.05). Complications and re-operation rate were higher in ILN group.

Conclusions: Our study concludes that LCP can be considered a better surgical option for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus as it had lower incidence of complications, less re-operation rate and better union rate. However, there is no difference between the two groups in terms of union time and functional outcome.


Keywords


Interlocking nail, Locking compression plate, Humeral diaphyseal fractures

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brinker MR, Connor ODP. The incidence of fractures and dislocations referred for orthopaedic services in a capitated population. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86A:290-7.

Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M. Fractures of the diaphyseal humerus. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, eds. Skeletal trauma, 3rd ed. Toronto: WB Saunders; 2001: 1481-1511.

Bohler L. Conservative treatment of fresh closed fractures of humerus. J Trauma. 1965;5:464-8.

Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, Latta LL, Capps CA. Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:478-86.

Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C. The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:143-50.

Balfour GW, Mooney V, Ashby ME. Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with a ready-made fracture brace. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:11-3.

Brumback RJ, Bosse MJ, Poka A, Burgess AR. Intramedullary stabilization of humeral shaft fractures in patients with multiple trauma. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986;68:960-70.

Mast JW, Spiegel PG, Harvey JP, Harrison C. Fractures of the humeral shaft. Clin Orthop. 1975;12:254-62.

Sarmiento A, Kinman P, Galvin E. Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:596-601.

Paris H, Tropiano P, D’orval CB, Chaudet H, Poitout DG. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: systematic plate fixation; Anatomic and functional results in 156 cases and a review of the literature. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86(4):346-59.

Wali MG, Baba AN, Latoo IA, Bhat NA, Baba OK, Sharma S. Internal fixation of shaft humerus fractures by dynamic compression plate or interlocking intramedullary nail: a prospective, randomised study. Strategies Trauma Limb Re-construction. 2014;9(3):133-40.

Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: Retrospective and prospective analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:453-8.

Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation. 4th ed. Springler-Verlog; New York; 1991: 118-120.

Rockwood C, Matsen F. The Shoulder. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990: 161.

Stewart MJ, Hundley JM. Fractures of the humerus: a comparative study in methods of treatment. JBJS. 1955;37:681-92.

Singisetti K, Ambedkar M. Nailing versus plating in humerus shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study. Int Orthop. 2010;34(4):571-6.

Ghosh S, Halder TC, Chaudhuri A, Datta S, Dasgupta S, Mitra UK. Comparative study of operative treatment of mid shaft fracture of humerus by locking plate versus intra-medullary interlocking nail. Medical J Dr DY Patil University. 2013;6(4):390-4.

Changulani M, Jain UK, Keswani T. Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus: a randomised controlled study. Int Orthop. 2007;31(3):391-5.

Liu GD, Zhang QG, Ou S. Meta-analysis of the outcomes of intramedullary nailing and plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Int J Surg. 2013;11:864-8.

Kurup H, Hossain M, Andrew JG. Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;6:CD005959.

McCormack RG, Brien D, Buckley RE, McKee MD, Powell J, Schemitsch EH. Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail: a prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(3):336-9.

Kumar R, Singh P, Chaudhary LJ, Singh S. Humeral shaft fracture management: a prospective study; nailing or plating. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2012;3(1):37-42.

Dai J, Chai Y, Wang C, Wen G. Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis of RCTs and nonrandomized studies. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19(2):282-91.

Putti AB, Uppin RB, Putti BB. Locked intramedullary nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Surg. 2009;17(2):139-41.

Ouyang H, Xiong J, Xiang P, Cui Z, Chen L, Yu B. Plate versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: an updated meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(3):387-95.

Puri SR, Biswas SK, Salgia A, Sanghi S, Aggarwal T, Kohli A. Operative management of fracture of shaft humerus by dynamic compression plate versus interlocking intramedullary nailing: a comparative prospective study of 30 cases. Medical J Dr DY Patil University. 2013;6(1):49-54.

Sommer C, Gautier E, Muller M, Helfet DL, Wagner M. First clinical results of the locking compression plate (LCP). Injury. 2003;34(2):43-54.

Petsatodes G, Karataglis D, Papadopoulos P. Antegrade interlocking of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9(3):247-52.

Yin P, Mao Z, Zhang L, Tao S, Zhang Q, Liang X, et al. Effectiveness comparison between locking compression plate fixation and locked intramedullary nail fixation for humeral shaft fracture of types B and C. Chinese J Reparative Reconstructive Surg. 2013;27(12):1457-61.

Fan Y, Li YW, Zhang HB, Liu JF, Han XM, Chang X, et al. Management of Humeral Shaft Fractures with Intramedullary Interlocking Nail Versus Locking Compression Plate. Orthopedics. 2015;38(9):825-9.

Wei HS, Qinruixian, Bin L, Guangyu D, Chuanxiu S, Xuegang S, et al. Comparison study of the clinical effect and biomechanics between locking compression plate and interlocking intramedullary nail for humerus shaft fracture. Biomed Res. 2017;28(14):6251-5.

Hems TE, Bhullar TP. Interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures; The Oxford experiences. 1991-1994. Injury. 1996;27:485-9.

Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH. Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:279-84.

Chao TC, Chou WY, Chung JC, Hsu CJ. Humeral shaft fractures treated by dynamic compression plates, ender nails and interlocking nails. Int Orthop. 2005;29:88-91.