DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20210042

Evaluation of effectiveness of Ponseti's method in the clubfoot management under 1-year children: a prospective study

Prateek Girotra, K. Prashanth Kumar, Rejo Varghese Jacob

Abstract


Background: Congenital talipes equino Varus is common congenital orthopedic foot deformity in children characterized by hindfootequinus, hind foot varus, midfoot cavus, and forefoot adduction deformities. There is a necessity to analyze the number of casts employed in the treatment, compliance of bracing, relapse pattern and percentages of surgical referral under 1 year of age for clear understanding and better practice to achieve successful outcomes. This study aimed to judge the effectiveness of Ponseti in the treatment of clubfoot under 1-year old children.  

Methods: The patients were selected in the OPD and evaluated for virgin idiopathic clubfoot under 1-year age. Serial casting done weekly by Ponseti method after assessing Pirani and Demeglio score before every cast.

Results: In our study all 29 clubfeet that were treated by Ponseti method showed complete correction. Minimum cast being 5 and maximum being 10 casts. Corrected feet were supple, plantigrade and painless of which 1 foot had relapse<3weeks due to ill-fitting shoes. Which was subsequently corrected with repeat tenotomy and cast application.

Conclusions: The Ponseti method is a safe, effective, cheap and reproducible method for correction of CTEV which significantly reduces the rate of extensive corrective surgeries for correction of clubfoot under 1-year age. For successful outcome and to prevent relapse, this technique must be applied strictly in accordance to the protocol and parents must be taught the importance of full compliance with bracing. Our series has a short follow up. Longer follow-up is needed for further evaluation of effectiveness of Ponseti method.  


Keywords


Ponseti method, CTEV, Serial casting, Tenotomy, Bracing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wallace B. Lehman. The clubfoot. J. B. Lippincott Company. 1980.

Ponseti IV. Current concepts review: Treatment of congenital clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74-A:4

Ponseti IV, Smoley EN. Congenital clubfoot. The results of treatment. Bone Joint Surg. 1963;45A:261:48-454.

Ponseti IV. Common errors in the treatment of congenital clubfoot. Int Orthopaed. 21:137-141:1997.

Ponseti IV. Editorial, Clubfoot management. Pediatr Orthop. 20:699-700:2000.

Ponseti IV, Campos J. Observations on pathogenesis and treatment of congenital clubfoot. Clin Orth Rei Res. 1972;84:50-60.

Dimeglio A. Classification of talipesequinovarus. The Clubfoot. The present and a view of the future. Ed. Simons, G.W. Springer Verlag. 1994.

van Mulken JM, Bulstra SK, Hoefnagels NH. Evaluation of the treatment of clubfeet with the Diméglio score. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(5):642-7.

Pirani S. A method of evaluating the virgin clubfoot with substantial inter-observer reliability. Miami Florida. 1995.

Pirani, Pirani S, Outerbridge H, Moran M. A method of evaluating the virgin clubfoot with substantial interobserver reliability. Presented at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, Miami, Fla, 1995

Kite H. The classic. Principles involved in the treatment of congenital clubfoot. Clin Orth Rel Res. 1972;84:4-8.

Turco VJ. Club foot. Churchill Livingstone 1981.

Chung CS, Nemechek RW, Larsen IJ, Chung GHS. Genetic and epidemiological studies of clubfoot in Hawaii Human Heredity. 1969;19:321

Sharma A, Shukla S, Kiran B, Michail S, Agashe M. Can the Pirani Score Predict the Number of Casts and the Need for Tenotomy in the Management of Clubfoot by the Ponseti Method? Malays Orthop J. 2018;12(1):26-30.

McKay DW. New concept of an approach to clubfoot treatment: section III. Evaluat Res Pediatr Ort. 1983;41.

Heilig MR, Matern RV, Rosenzweig SD, Bennett JT. Current management of idiopathic clubfoot questionnaire: a multicentric study. J Pediat Orthopaed. 2003;23(6):780-7.

Richards BS, Johnston CE, Wilson H. Nonoperative clubfoot treatment using the French physical therapy method. J Pediat Orthopaed. 2005;25(1):98-102.

Simons GW. Complete subtalar release in club feet. Part II--Comparison with less extensive procedures. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985 Sep;67(7):1056-65.

Aronson J, Puskarich CL. Deformity and disability from treated clubfoot. J Pediat Orthoped. 1990;10(1):109-19.

Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot: A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77:1477-89.

Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV. Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg. 1980;62(1):23-31.

Fan H, Liu Y, Zhao L, Chu C, An Y, Wang T, et al. The correlation of Pirani and Dimeglio scoring systems for Ponseti management at different levels of deformity severity. Scientif Rep. 2017;7(1):1-8.

Gurzu S. Congenital Clubfoot in Children After Walking Age: Management and Evaluation of 41 Feet with the Dimeglio Score. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013

Jochymek J, Peterková T. Are scoring systems useful for predicting results of treatment for clubfoot using the ponseti method?. Acta ortopedica brasileira. 2019;27(1):8-11.

Hussain FN. The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89-B(4):561.

Dyer PJ, Davis N. The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88(8):1082-4.