DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20211605

The influence of joint line position on functional outcome in primary total knee arthroplasty

Nikhil Gupta, Rajesh Singh, Akash Saxena

Abstract


Background: To find out the cut off for position of joint line which will provide a good functional outcome.

Methods: 58 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty using standard medial parapatellar approach were included in this study. Pre-operative and post-operative radiological joint line were assessed. Pre-operative and post-operative functional assessment were done using oxford knee score and International knee society score. functional outcome was assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months. Influence of post-operative joint line change on functional outcome was assessed on follow up visit in 6th month.

Results: Of 58 patients studied, mean age ± SD was 69.0±7.5 years. Joint line elevation of 36, 16, 8 and 2 patients were between 0-2, 2-4 4-8 and>8 mm respectively with mean ± SD of joint line elevation of 2.24±2.07 mm in the group. Mean OKS-knee score at 6 months follow-up of study group was 36.60 with mean IKSS-knee score of 38.17 at 6 months follow up of group<4 mm which was significant (p<0.05) when compared to mean IKSS-knee score at 6 months follow up of group>4 mm (28.40).

Conclusions: It was concluded that joint line restoration is necessary for getting a good functional outcome after primary total knee arthroplasty. The functional outcome of patients with joint line elevation between 4-8mm showed inferior outcomes in comparison to the patients with joint line elevation within 4 mm.


Keywords


Arthroplasty, Joint line, Functional outcome

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2010;468(1):57-63.

Choi YJ, Ra HJ. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Knee surg rel res. 2016;28(1):1.

Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, Holland J, Deehan DJ. Increased symptoms of stiffness 1 year after total knee arthroplasty are associated with a worse functional outcome and lower rate of patient satisfaction. Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy. 2019;27(4):1196-203.

Lange JK, Lee YY, Spiro SK, Haas SB. Satisfaction rates and quality of life changes following total knee arthroplasty in age-differentiated cohorts. J arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1373-8.

Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J bone joint surg Am. 1986;68(7):1035-40.

Emodi GJ, Callaghan JJ, Pedersen DR, Brown TD. Posterior cruciate ligament function following total knee arthroplasty: the effect of joint line elevation. Iowa orthop j. 1999;19:82.

Cope MR, O'brien BS, Nanu AM. The influence of the posterior cruciate ligament in the maintenance of joint line in primary total knee arthroplasty: a radiologic study. J arthroplasty. 2002;17(2):206-8.

Wyss TF, Schuster AJ, Münger P, Pfluger D, Wehrli U. Does total knee joint replacement with the soft tissue balancing surgical technique maintain the natural joint line? Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2006;126(7):480-6.

Ritter MA, Montgomery TJ, Zhou H, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB. The clinical significance of proximal tibial resection level in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1999;360:174-81.

Porteous AJ, Hassaballa MA, Newman JH. Does the joint line matter in revision total knee replacement? J bone joint surg Bri. 2008;90(7):879-84.

Mihalko WM, Krackow KA. Posterior cruciate ligament effects on the flexion space in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1999;360:243-50.

Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop relat res. 1989;248(248):13-4.

Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J bone joint surg Bri. 1998;80(1):63-9.

Lee KJ, Moon JY, Song EK, Lim HA, Seon JK. Minimum two-year results of revision total knee arthroplasty following infectious or non-infectious causes. Knee surg rel res. 2012;24(4):227.

Hofmann AA, Kurtin SM, Lyons S, Tanner AM, Bolognesi MP. Clinical and radiographic analysis of accurate restoration of the joint line in revision total knee arthroplasty. J arthroplasty. 2006;21(8):1154-62.

Chonko DJ, Lombardi JA, Berend K. Patella Baja and total knee arthroplasty (TKA): etiology, diagnosis, and management. Surgical technol int. 2004;12:231-8.

Weale AE, Murray DW, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE. The length of the patellar tendon after uni-compartmental and total knee replacement. J bone joint surg Bri. 1999;81(5):790-5.

Choudhary P, Bahre S. Influence of prosthetic joint line position on outcome after total knee replacement. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;3(5):951.

Insall J, Goldberg V, Salvati E. Recurrent dislocation and the high-riding patella. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1972;88:67-9.

Lancourt JE, Cristini JA. Patella Alta and patella infera. Their etiological role in patellar dislocation, chondromalacia, and apophysitis of the tibial tubercle. J bone joint surg Am. 1975;57(8):1112-5.

Martin JW, Whiteside LA. The influence of joint line position on knee stability after condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin orthop rel res. 1990;259:146-56.

Singerman R, Heiple KG, Davy DT. Effect of tibial component position on patellar strain following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:651.

Selvarajah E, Hooper G. Restoration of the joint line in total knee arthroplasty. J arthroplasty. 2009;24(7):1099-102.

Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH, Barrack RL, Moore J. Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin orthop rel res. 1999;367:165-71.

Snider MG, MacDonald SJ. The influence of the posterior cruciate ligament and component design on joint line position after primary total knee arthroplasty. J arthroplasty. 2009;24(7):1093-8.

Figgie HE. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(7):1035-40.

Yang JH, Seo JG, Moon YW, Kim MH. Joint line changes after navigation-assisted mobile-bearing TKA. Orthopedics. 2009;32(10):35-9.

Goh GS, Liow MH, Lim WS, Tay DK, Yeo SJ, Tan MH. Accelerometer-based navigation is as accurate as optical computer navigation in restoring the joint line and mechanical axis after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective matched study. J arthroplasty. 2016;31(1):92-7

Lee HJ, Lee JS, Jung HJ, Song KS, Yang JJ, Park CW. Comparison of joint line position changes after primary bilateral total knee arthroplasty performed using the navigation-assisted measured gap resection or gap balancing techniques. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2011;19(12):2027-32.

Liow MH, Xia Z, Wong MK, Tay KJ, Yeo SJ, Chin PL. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J arthroplasty. 2014;29(12):2373-7.

Pang HN, Yeo SJ, Chong HC, Chin PL, Chia SL, Lo NN. Joint line changes and outcomes in constrained versus unconstrained total knee arthroplasty for the type II valgus knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy. 2013;21(10):2363-9.

Bae DK, Song SJ, Park CH, Liang H, Bae JK. Comparison of mid-term results between conversion total knee arthroplasties following closed wedge high tibial osteotomy and primary total knee arthroplasties: a matched pair study including patellar symptom and position. J Orthop Sci. 2017;22(3):495-500.