Comparison study of compound fractures of tibial shaft treated by titanium and stainless steel interlocking nails

Authors

  • Pratik J. Vinchhi Department of Orthopaedics, GCS Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Sharvil H. Gajjar Department of Orthopaedics, GCS Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Tirth Vyas Department of Orthopaedics, Port Trust hospital Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Yatin Patel Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20171549

Keywords:

Open fracture, Tibia, Titanium, Stainless steel, Interlocking nail, Modified Ketenjian’s criteria

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcomes of compound fractures of tibia shaft managed by Solid Titanium and Stainless Steel interlocking intramedullary nailing.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of 45 patients with 45 open fractures of tibia shaft operated primarily by either Solid Titanium or Stainless steel tibia interlocking nail.

Results: In Our Study we had 45 patients with 45 open tibial fractures. All were male. 35 patients were from 20-50 years age group. Mean age was 36.4 years. In this study of 45 open tibial fractures following strict protocol of thorough debridement, primary wound closure and Solid Titanium or stainless steel interlocking nailing; it was observed at final follow up that patients operated by titanium nail compared to stainless steel had 6.45% vs. 14.29% infection rate, 12.9% vs. 21.89% rate of non-union and 3.22% vs. 7.14% screw breakage rate. According to modified ketenjian’s criteria in our study out of 31 patients operated by Titanium interlocking nail 17 (54.84%) excellent, 10 (32.26%) Good, 3(9.68%) fair and 1(3.22%) poor functional results while out of 14 patients managed by stainless steel nail 8 (57.14%) excellent, 3 (21.43%) good, 1 (7.14%) fair and 2 (14.28%) poor functional results.

Conclusions: In open tibial fractures titanium interlocking implants offer lower complication rate as compared to stainless steel implants and better overall patient outcome.

Author Biography

Sharvil H. Gajjar, Department of Orthopaedics, GCS Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Senior resident. Department of orthopaedics. GCS medical college and hospital, ahmedabad

References

Court Brown CM, McBirnie J. The epidemiology of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:417-21.

Zettas JP, Zettas P, Thanosophon B. Injury patterns in motor cycle accidents. J Trauma. 1979;19:833-6.

Rockwood Charles A Jr, Green David P. Rockwood & Green's Fractures in Adults. Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, editors. Fractures of the Tibia and Fibula. 6th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006: 2081.

Rockwood Charles A Jr, Green David P. Rockwood & Green's Fractures in Adults. Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, editors. Bone and joint healing. 6th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006: 305.

Thakur AJ. The elements of fracture fixation. 2nd edition. Intramedullary nailing. 2006: 143.

Hak DJ, Toker S, Yi C, Toreson J. The Influence of Fracture Fixation Biomechanics on Fracture Healing. Orthopedics. 2010;33(10):752-5.

Xu WZ, Guo XD, Zhao JC, Wang YJ. Effect of autocontrol micromotion intramedullary interlocking nail on fracture healing: an experimental study. Chin J Traumatol. 2006;9(3):152-60.

Pieske O, Geleng P, Zaspel J, Piltz S. Titanium Alloy Pins Versus Stainless Steel Pins in External Fixation at the Wrist: A Randomized Prospective Study. J Trauma. 2008;64(5):1275-80.

Soultanis KC, Pyrovolou N, Zahos KA, Karaliotas GI, Lenti A, Liveris I, et al. Late postoperative infection following spinal instrumentation: stainless steel versus titanium implants, J Surg Orthop Adv. 2008;17(3):193-9.

Blachut PA, O'Brien PJ, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM. Interlocking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming for the treatment of closed fractures of the tibial shaft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(5):640-6.

Corrales LA, Morshed S, Bhandari M, Miclau T 3rd. Variability in the assessment of fracture healing in Orthopaedic Trauma Studies. J Bone and Joint Surgery. 2008;90(9):1862-8.

Sledge SL, Jhonson KD, Henley MB, Watson JT. Intramedullary nailing with reaming to treat nonunion of the tibia. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1987;71(7):1004-19.

Campanacci M, Zanoli S. Delayed union in tibial shaft fractures, a review of 171 cases. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1966;48(1):44-56.

Weissman S, Herold Z., Engelberg M. Fractures of the Middle two thirds of the tibial shaft: Results of treatment without internal fixation in 140 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48:257-67.

Whittle AP, Russell TA, Taylor JC, Lavelle DG. Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft with the use of interlocking nailing without reaming. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1162–71.

Joshi D, Ahmed A, Krishna L, Lal Y. Unreamed interlocking nailing in open fractures of tibia, J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2004:12(2); 216-21.

Jain V, Aggarwal A. Primary unreamed intramedullary locked nailing in open fractures of tibia. IJO. 2005;39(1):30-2.

Ketenjian AY, Shelton MJ. Primary internal fixation of open fractures: a retrospective study of the use of metallic fixation in fresh open fractures. J Trauma. 1972;12:756–63.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles