DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20172888

Follow up assessment of patients with humeral bridge plate technique with two year period

Tushar Vegad, Dipak Suthar

Abstract


Background: Minimally invasive technique brings together the ease of handling of plates and the relative stability principle of nails. Although there are still only a few studies on this, the initial results have been very satisfactory. The aim of the present study was to report the experience of our shoulder and elbow surgery group relating to treatment of fractures of the humerus, by means of the bridge plate technique, using an anterior route.

Methods: The present study included twenty patients suffering from humerus shaft fracture. The study was done for a total period of two years. The immobilization of the operated shoulder was done till the stitches were removed and average period of the three weeks were kept for immobilization of the shoulder. At the end of the period of immobilization, the patients were asked to perform the active gentle limb range of motion exercises on the basis of their permission of the pain control.

Results: On the basis of the UCLA score the excellent to good score were found in 16 cases, fair score in rest 4 patients. Less than 5° of valgus angulation intra operatively and on following these patients up, in 4 of the cases the angulation was found to be of acceptable alignment. In the two cases, 5° of varus, angulations was found at the end of one year but it did not affect the functional outcome.

Conclusions: Anterior bridge plating after anterior approach is safe and reproducible option, respects the principles of biological fixation with minimal soft tissue dissection, preserves fracture haematoma and periosteal blood supply, and is more forgiving in comminute fractures of the diaphysis. 


Keywords


Humeral fracture, Minimal invasive technique, Bridge plating, Anterior route

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mader K, Mader S, Berntsson P-O. The Diaphysis: Nonsurgical Treatment. Simple and Complex Fractures of the Humerus. Springer Milan;. 2012: 13-20.

Sarmiento A, Latta L. Functional fracture bracing: tibia, humerus, and ulna. Springer Science & Business Media. 1995.

Aronson J. for Bone Regeneration and Repair. Bone Regeneration and Repair. Biol Clin Applications. 2005: 195.

Iwegbu G. Principles and management of acute orthopaedic trauma. AuthorHouse; 2015.

Walker M, Palumbo B, Badman B, Brooks J, Van Gelderen J, Mighell M. Humeral shaft fractures: a review. Journal Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:833-44.

Kumar V, Rathinam M. Fractures of the shaft of humerus. Orthopaed Trauma. 2013;27:393-402.

Greiwe R. Proximal humerus fractures: Percutaneous fixation, proximal humeral nailing, and open reduction and internal fixation. Shoulder and Elbow Trauma and its Complications. The Shoulder. 2015;1:83.

Kiran K. A study of surgical management of diaphyseal fractures of humerus in adults by open reduction and internal fixation with dynamic compression plate and screws. RGUHS. 2006.

Raja K. A study of fracture shaft humerus treated with closed intramedullary nailing. RGUHS. 2005.

McRae R, Esser M. Practical fracture treatment: Elsevier Health Sci. 2008.

Hamblen DL, Simpson H: Adams's outline of orthopaedics. Elsevier Health Sci. 2009.

Mahajan AS, Kim YG, Kim JH, D'sa P, Lakhani A, Ok HS. Is Anterior Bridge Plating for Mid-Shaft Humeral Fractures a Suitable Option for Patients Predominantly Involved in Overhead Activities? A Functional Outcome Study in Athletes and Manual Laborers. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016;8:358-66.

Lian K, Wang L, Lin D, Chen Z. Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis for mid-distal third humeral shaft fractures. Orthopedics. 2013;36:1025-32.