Prospective study of managing long bone fracture nonunion: is bone graft needed in every case?

Authors

  • Srinivas Balagani Department of Orthopedics, R. V. M. Medical College, Laxmakkapally, Siddipet, Telangana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20182035

Keywords:

Long bone, Nonunion, Hypertrophic, Atrophic

Abstract

Background: Increased road traffic accidents lead to increased incidence of fracture of long bones. It has a tendency of non-union. Infection is very common in these cases which are an important cause of nonunion of long bone fractures. The objective of the study was to study the incidence and patterns of non-union of long bone fracture.

Methods: Hospital based prospective study was carried out at Department of Orthopedics, from June 2017 to March 2018. Patients admitted to wards of Department of Orthopedics with nonunion of long bones were included. During the study period a total of 20 cases were eligible for the present study as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: Males were more affected than females. Most commonly affected age group was 41-50 years and 61-70 years (25% each). Most commonly affected long bone was femur in 35% of the cases. Most common type of non-union was hypertrophic (50%). Most common cause of non-union was broken implant in 35% of the cases. Maximum number of patients had union in 4-6 months in 60% of the cases after surgery of previous non-union of long bones. Only four patients developed complications like shortening of the limb or persistent non-union.

Conclusions: Hypertrophic non unions doesn’t require bone graft, they require only stable fixation. For removal of broken implant in hypertrophic non-union if we open the fracture site, then even the gap after debridement of fracture site shows partial segmental defect it doesn’t require bone grafting.

References

Rockwood CA, Green DP and Robert W. Local Complications. In: Bucholz RW, Cour-Brown M (eds) Rockwood and green textbook of fractures in adults. Vol. 1. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009: 586–592.

USFDA. Guidance document for the preparation of investigational device exemptions and pre-market approval applications for bone growth stimulator devices. Rockvitte: United States Food and Drug Administration, 1988.

Brinker MR, O'Connor DP. Outcomes of tibial non-union in older adults following treatment using the Ilizarov method. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(9):634-42.

Dendrinos GK, Kontos S, Lyritsis E. Use of the Ilizarov technique for treatment of non-union of the tibia associated with infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(6):835-46.

Seenappa HK, Shukla MJ, Narasimhaiah M. Management of complex long bone non unions using limb reconstruction system. Indian J Orthop. 2013;47(6):602-7.

Ebraheim NA, Buchanan GS, Liu X, Cooper ME, Peters N, Hessey JA, et al. Treatment of distal femur non-union following initial fixation with a lateral locking plate. Orthop Surg. 2016;8(3):323-30.

Holzman MA, Hanus BD, Munz JW, O’Connor DP, Brinker MR. Addition of a medial locking plate to an in situ lateral locking plate results in healing of distal femoral non unions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(6):1498-505.

Egol KA, Gruson K, Spitzer AB, Walsh M, Tejwani NC. Do successful surgical results after operative treatment of long bone non unions correlate with outcomes? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(11):2979-85.

Collinge C, Devinney S, Herscovici D, DiPasguale T, Sanders R. Anterior inferior plate fixation of middle third fractures and non-union of the clavicle. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(10):680-6.

El Haj M, Khoury A, Mosheiff R, Lieberqall M, Weil YA. Orthogonal double plate fixation for long bone fracture non-union. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2013;80(2):131-7.

Egol KA, Bechtel C, Spitzer AB, Rybak L, Walsh M, Davidovitch R. Treatment of long bone non unions: factors affecting healing. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012;70(4):224-31.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles