Treatment of distal tibia fractures: plating versus intramedullary nailing

Authors

  • Yashavantha Kumar C. Department Of Orthopaedics, M. S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore-54, Kranataka, India
  • Shivaprasad M. S. Department Of Orthopaedics, M. S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore-54, Kranataka, India
  • Trilok V. Department Of Orthopaedics, M. S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore-54, Kranataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20163035

Keywords:

Distal, Tibia, Intramedullary, Nailing, Plating

Abstract

Background: Distal tibia shaft fractures pose significant challenge to treating surgeons. Giving more importance to anatomical reduction and ignoring often injured soft tissues has led to poor outcomes and high complication rates. Although multiple options are described to treat these fractures, there is no consensus on the best method of treatment. We hereby want to study the results of distal tibia fractures treated by expert tibia nailing and distal tibia plating.

Methods: This study was undertaken in patients who were operated in between January 2012 to March 2015 at M S Ramaiah Teaching Hospital, which is a tertiary care hospital in Bangalore. Study included 52 patients with distal tibia fracture treated by surgery. All the fractures were closed distal diaphyseal fractures without articular involvement. Thirty two patients underwent expert tibia nailing whereas 20 patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with locking plates. Patients were followed up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year.

Results: Fifty two patients included in study and they were divided into two groups as nailing group and plating group. Plating group included 20 patients whereas nailing group included 32 patients. The mode of injury was  road traffic injury in 32 cases , followed by self-fall in 17 cases and sports related injury in 3 cases. Distal tibia fracture was associated with in 29 patients (87%) of nailing group whereas in 17 patients (80) of plating group. Average distance of fracture from pilon was 6 cm in nailing group and 3cm in plating group.  The average duration of surgery in nailing was  group  was 88 minutes (range, 65-130 minutes) whereas average duration of surgery in  plating group was group  was 92 minutes (range, 70-130 minutes).  The average time for union was 16 weeks for nailing group and for plating group it was 18 weeks.  

Conclusions: Both intramedullary nailing and plating are the optimal methods of treatment. Plating is preferred in cases where fracture is close to pilon whereas intramedullary nailing is preferred for fractures away from tibial pilon. There is no significant difference between union and complication rates.

References

Newman SD, Mauffey CP, Krikler S. Distal metaphyseal tibial fractures. Injury. 2011;42:975-84.

Richard RD, Kubiak E, Horwirtz DS. Techniques of surgical treatment of distal tibial fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014;45:295-312.

Bedi A, Le TT, Karunakar MA. Surgical treatment of nonarticular distal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:406-16.

Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Patterson BM. Factors influencing functional outcomes after distal tibia shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:178-83.

Othman M, Strzelczyk P. Results of conservative treatment of "pilon" fractures. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2003;5:787-94.

Sarmiento A, Latta LL. 450 closed fractures of the distal third of the tibia treated with a functional brace. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:261-71.

Borg T, Larsson S, Lindsjo U. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures: prelimnary results in 21 patients. Injury. 2004;35:608-14.

Oh CW, Kyung HS, Park IH, Kim PT, Ihn JC. Distal tibial metaphyseal fractures treated by percutaneous plate osteosynthesis. Clin Orthop. 2003;408:286-91.

Toms AD, McMurtie A, Maffulli N. Percutaneous plating of the distal tibia. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:199-203.

Nork SE, Schwartz AK, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, Winquist RA. Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1213-21.

Robinson CM, McLauchlan GJ, McLean IP, Court-Brown CM. Distal metaphysical fractures of the tibia with minimal involvement of the ankle. Classification and treatment by locked intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1995;77:781-7.

Tan H. The clinical research of intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibial fractures. Hebei Med. 2012;18:1394-7.

Ke DF, Zeng QT. Study on the clinical effects of interlocking intramedullary nailing in internal fixation of distal tibia fractures. China Foreign Med Treat. 2013;28:25-6.

Toivanen JA, Vaisto O, Kannus P, Latvala K, Honkonen SE, Jarvinen MJ. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:580-5.

Court-Brown CM, Gustilo T, Shaw AD. Knee pain after intramedullary tibial nailing: its incidence, etiology, and outcome. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:103-5.

Emami A, Mjoberg B, Karlstrom G, Larsson S. Treatment of closed tibial shaft fractures with unilateral external fixation. Injury. 1995;26:299-303.

Helland P, Boe A, Molster AO, Solheim E, Hordvik M. Open tibial fractures treated with the Ex-fi-re external fixation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;326:209-20.

Toivanen JA, Vaisto O, Kannus P, Latvala K, Honkonen SE, Jarvinen MJ. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:580-5.

Court-Brown CM, Gustilo T, Shaw AD. Knee pain after intramedullary tibial nailing: its incidence, etiology, and outcome. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:103-5.

Tae SK. Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation. J Trauma. 2005;59(5):1219-23.

Yang SW, Tzeng HM, Chou YJ, Teng HP, Liu HH, Wong CY. Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2006;37:531-5.

Seyhan M, Unay K, Sener N. Intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous locked plating of distal extra-articular tibial fractures: a retrospective study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2012;23:595-601.

Janssen KW, Biert J, van Kampen A. Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail: a retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. Int Orthop. 2007;31:709-14.

Li Y, Liu L, Tang X, Pei F, Wang G. Comparison of low, multidirectional locked nailing and plating in the treatment of distal tibial metadiaphyseal fractures. Int Orthop. 2012;36:1457-62.

Yavuz U, Sokucu S, Demir B, Yildirim T, Ozcan C. Comparison of intramedullary nail and plate fixation in distal tibia diaphyseal fractures close to the mortise. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014;20:189-93.

Zhang C, Jiang Y, An ZQ, Wang JW, Shen J. Interlocking intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous plating in osteosynthesis of metaphyseal fractures of distal tibia. Chin J Orthop Trauma. 2007;9:131-4.

Krettek C, Stephan C, Schandelmaier P. The use of Poller screws as blocking screws in stabilising tibial fractures treated with small diameter intramedullary nails. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:963-8.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-03

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles