DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20164163

A comparative study between proximal femur locking compression plate and dynamic hip screw fixation in management of intertrochantric femur fractures

Mithlesh Kumar Meena, Vinay Joshi

Abstract


Background: Proximal femur fractures are one of the commonest fracture encountered in orthopaedic trauma practice. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) is the gold standard procedure for treatment for stable intertrochanteric  fractures, however problem arises with unstable fractures in maintenance of neck shaft angle and proper reduction. Here we are giving results of trochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral locking compression plate (PFLCP) as compared with dynamic hip screw (DHS).

Methods: This study was a prospective study. Two groups of trochanteric fractures of 25 patients operated with DHS and LCP were taken. Each patient was followed-up from July 2011 to October 2012 for minimum of 12 month or till the bony union. Every fracture was classified according to AO classification. Functional results will be assessed as per modified Harris hip evaluation score.

Results: Among 25 patient treated with PFLCP, length discrepancy was .857 cm while that for DHS was 1.2 cm. The mean time of unaided walking with LCP Was 14.20 weeks while for DHS it was 16.20 weeks. The mean varus angulation for LCP 8 degree while for DHS 10.2 degree. In LCP in 1 case screw cut out from head and neck of femur while in DHS, same is seen in 2 cases and in addition loss of position of lag screw seen in 5 cases.one case was found with superficial infection in LCP while in case of DHS 3 cases with deep infection for that implant was removed and 6 cases were found with superficial infection.

Conclusions: Proximal femoral locking plate (PFLCP) is simple, stable for fixation with fewer complications, and is an effective method for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.  Comparing with DHS group, the locking plate has shorter operative time, fewer blood loss and drainage.


Keywords


Modified harris hip score, Proximal femur locking plate, Dynamic hip screw

Full Text:

PDF

References


Campbell WC, Canale ST, Beaty JH. Campbells operative orthopaedics. 11th edition. Philldelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2008.

Paganini-Hill A, Chao A, Ross RK, Henderson BE. Exercise and other factors in the prevention of hip fracture: the leisure world study. Epidemiology.1991;2(1):16-25.

Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults.7thed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

Gadegone WM, Salphale YS. Proximal femoral nail – an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 year. Int Ortho. 2007;31(3):403-8.

Kouvidis GK, Sommers MB, Giannoudis PV, Katonis PG, Bottlang M. Comparison of migration behaviour between single and dual lag screw implants for intertrochanteric fracture fixation. J Ortho Surg Res. 2009;4:16.

Zha Gc Chen ZL, Qi XB, Sun JY. Treatment of pertrochanteric fractures with a proximal femur locking compression plate. Surgery. 2011;42(11):1294-9.

Zhu QL, Yan MH, Zhao LL, Xu B, Rong LJ, Luo JM. Analysis of treatment of osteoporotic inter-trochantric fracture of femur with the locking compression plate (LCP). Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2011;24(5):378-81

Wang Y, Yang YY, Yu ZH, Zheng XX. A Comparitive study of intertrochantric fracture with proximal femur locking compress plate in aged. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2011;24(5):370-3.

Kim WY, Han CH, Park Ji, Kim JY. Failure of intertrochantric fracture fixation with dynamic hip screw in relation to preoperative fracture stability and osteoporosis. In Ortho.2001;25:360-2.

Wieser K, Babst R. Fixation failure of the LCP proximal femoral plate 4.55.0 in patient with missing posteromedial support in unstable pre-, inter-, and subtrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Arch Orthp Trauma surg. 2010;130:1281-7.

Glassner PJ, Tejwani NC. Failure of proximal Femoral Locking Compression Plate; A Case Series. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(2):76-83.